Random Mass Murders – Gun Control

Title – RANDOM MASS MURDERS  (Framed by the Administration as Gun Violence)

1      OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to form an understanding of the current problem of irrational or random mass murders in the US, what is being done about it and what can/should be done about it. This is primarily an exercise to determine whether such a thing is possible and how difficult it might be.

2      Scope

Initially this study is focused on events within the United States perpetrated by its residents against its residents for no immediately apparent reason. This study will primarily consider events that involve multiple murders but can include events which merely have the potential for multiple murders (attempted). It will not include individual murders with clear motives. It will not include the actions of members of sub-cultural groups who may be motivated by perceived grievances (no matter how irrational the perception) unless the relationship of the member to the group is tenuous.

It will not include suicides. It will define the issue as clearly as possible and my current position in regard to proposed policy, actions or solutions.  It will remain an open study as long as the issue persists. I will attempt to list short term and long term public policy solutions.

A separate study has been set up to cover a broader aspect of gun violence which has currently reached a critical point – that of Gang Violence involving guns,

3      Background

Over the past 20 – 30 years there have been a series of mass killings (40+) which because of their brutal, random, senseless and unpredictable nature have garnered a good deal of publicity and caused a commensurate level of concern among the general public. In recent years it included a theatre killing in Colorado, the massacre of 20 children and 6 teachers in Newtown CT. and a few campus shootings such as the one in Oregon etc.

I am having difficulty finding the proper terminology to frame the issue as I see it. It should include at least some acts of terrorism such as those committed by Americans against Americans within the US (Timothy McVey), It should include random violence which could result in serious injury or death. It should not include crimes that are obviously explained like suicide, or murder/mayhem directed toward specific individuals or even specific groups who may have harmed the perpetrators in some direct way either real or imagined. This study should not include the acts of any large political or religious group who might have an obvious motive (no matter how irrational the motive itself might be) but it can include the acts of individuals within those groups, particularly if the connection to the group is tenuous.

4      Analysis To Date

The following Diagram describes the process of random mass killing in terms of its inputs or causal factors and its outputs or resultant factors with a feedback loop shown as a dashed line.

This is just the initial attempt to define the process. I need to more clearly identify/classify the perpetrators, the cultural influences that drive them, the manufacturers of the weapons and what drives them and how they drive the culture etc.

Chain Diagram - Issue 1 - Mass Murder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5      Conclusions To Date

The problem is basically a mismatch in our cultural evolution. Our Technology (specifically weaponry) has gotten way out in front of our Social capabilities (specifically legislative and legal). We need to balance the two. Since this is an evolutionary process it won’t or possibly can’t take place overnight. We need to make whatever changes (variations) we can on a short term basis and lay out a more effective set of variations that can be selected on a longer term basis,

5.1     Short Term variations that are being tried:

We need to counter the effect of such acts and the related publicity with re-assuring action. The Administration is attempting to pass a few laws that will restrict the easy availability of powerful weapons. This is not too likely to reassure the public on a long term basis . However, I’m in favor of anything that will or might be re-assuring even on a temporary basis.

Specifically, the Administration has proposed:

5.1.1         CLOSING BACKGROUND CHECK LOOPHOLES TO KEEP GUNS OUT OF DANGEROUS HANDS

5.1.1.1        REQUIRE BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR ALL GUN SALES

5.1.1.2      STRENGTHEN THE BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM

5.1.2      BANNING MILITARY-STYLE ASSAULT WEAPONS AND HIGH-CAPACITY MAGAZINES, AND TAKING OTHER COMMON-SENSE STEPS TO REDUCE GUN VIOLENCE

5.1.2.1      GET MILITARY-STYLE ASSAULT WEAPONS AND HIGH-CAPACITY MAGAZINES OFF THE STREETS

5.1.2.2      GIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT ADDITIONAL TOOLS TO PREVENT AND PROSECUTE GUN CRIME

5.1.2.3      END THE FREEZE ON GUN VIOLENCE RESEARCH

5.1.2.4      PRESERVE THE RIGHTS OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS TO PROTECT THEIR PATIENTS AND COMMUNITIES FROM GUN VIOLENCE:

5.1.2.5      ENCOURAGE GUN OWNERS TO LIVE UP TO THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO STORE GUNS SAFELY

5.1.3      MAKING SCHOOLS SAFER

5.1.3.1      ENSURE EVERY SCHOOL HAS A COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.1.3.2      CREATE A SAFER CLIMATE AT SCHOOLS ACROSS THE COUNTRY

5.1.4      IMPROVING MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

5.1.4.1      MAKE SURE STUDENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS GET TREATMENT FOR MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES

5.1.4.2      ENSURE COVERAGE OF MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT

 

The Administration has implemented these recommendations to the extent possible through Presidential Orders. There has been more opposition than support from Congress.

 

5.2     Long Term variations that need to be initiated:

We need to restate the Second Amendment to the Constitution. This will take years and many political battles but it is necessary. The right to own guns should not be abridged any more than the right to own a motor vehicle. However the associated responsibilities must be spelled out and regulation must be mandated.

The current reference to a well regulated militia must be changed to specify the National Guard as THE Militia.

Advertisements

One thought on “Random Mass Murders – Gun Control

  1. You’re missing a big factor in your system diagram: motives and deterrents. What are the motives behind each perpetrator? What would deter them? What doesn’t deter them?

    The next stage is to understand the origin of the motives and address that origins.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s